Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
docs:comparison_light_sheet_methods [2016/01/28 19:25] Jon Daniels [Commercial Light Sheet Microscopes] |
docs:comparison_light_sheet_methods [2017/07/20 20:11] (current) Jon Daniels [Commercial Light Sheet Microscopes] |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Zeiss Z.1 (similar to OpenSPIM) | | Zeiss Z.1 (similar to OpenSPIM) | ||
| Leica TCS SP8 DLS | 1 fixed | Dish with media | Single proprietary | | Leica TCS SP8 DLS | 1 fixed | Dish with media | Single proprietary | ||
+ | | 3i Lattice Light Sheet | 1 fixed | Small coverslip in dish | Single proprietary | ||
| LaVision BioTec Ultramicroscope | | LaVision BioTec Ultramicroscope | ||
- | In general the diSPIM approach is ideal for cells or small groups of cells (e.g. c. elegans embryos). | + | In general the diSPIM approach is ideal for cells or small groups of cells (e.g. c. elegans embryos). |
Instruments which rely on a single fixed view lead to relatively poor axial resolution and poor imaging of scattering samples. | Instruments which rely on a single fixed view lead to relatively poor axial resolution and poor imaging of scattering samples. | ||
Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
* two fixed orthogonal views without moving the sample (ideal for fast-moving samples) | * two fixed orthogonal views without moving the sample (ideal for fast-moving samples) | ||
* two views can be combined computationally for isotropic resolution | * two views can be combined computationally for isotropic resolution | ||
- | * scattering slightly mitigated slightly by having two views; typically 30-150 um imaging depth depending on sample | + | * scattering slightly mitigated slightly by having two views; typically 30-300 um imaging depth depending on sample |
* inverted microscope objective allows simultaneous photomanipulation or other techniques | * inverted microscope objective allows simultaneous photomanipulation or other techniques | ||
* 40x 0.8 NA water-dipping objectives most common (others possible) | * 40x 0.8 NA water-dipping objectives most common (others possible) | ||
Line 40: | Line 41: | ||
* uses axially-arranged objectives with special mirrors to create orthogonal light sheet | * uses axially-arranged objectives with special mirrors to create orthogonal light sheet | ||
* one fixed view => relatively poor axial resolution, scattering not mitigated | * one fixed view => relatively poor axial resolution, scattering not mitigated | ||
+ | * light sheet parallel to dish bottom, so flat samples must be tilted with respect to dish | ||
* lattice light sheet | * lattice light sheet | ||
* uses structured light sheet " | * uses structured light sheet " | ||
* scattering strongly affects lattice formation as well as imaging; typically <20 um imaging depth | * scattering strongly affects lattice formation as well as imaging; typically <20 um imaging depth | ||
* can obtain sub-diffraction images like SIM by combining multiple exposures with shifted lattice; cost is extra time/dose like SIM | * can obtain sub-diffraction images like SIM by combining multiple exposures with shifted lattice; cost is extra time/dose like SIM | ||
- | * objectives dipped in media from above ([[http:// | + | * objectives dipped in media at angle from above ([[http:// |
- | * 25x 1.1 NA detection objective and custom excitation objective for fixed single-view | + | * 25x 1.1 NA detection objective and custom excitation objective for fixed single-view; axial resolution |
- | * beginning to be commercialized by [[https:// | + | * commercialized by [[https:// |
Note: if anything here is inaccurate please simply create an account and fix it! | Note: if anything here is inaccurate please simply create an account and fix it! | ||