Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
docs:comparison_with_confocal [2015/08/06 20:04] Jon Daniels |
docs:comparison_with_confocal [2016/01/26 17:51] Jon Daniels |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Spinning disk confocal (SDCM) is just a massively parallel confocal implementation so it's faster but otherwise has the some characteristics as laser scanning confocal. | Spinning disk confocal (SDCM) is just a massively parallel confocal implementation so it's faster but otherwise has the some characteristics as laser scanning confocal. | ||
- | * **Light dose: | + | * **Light dose: |
* A rule of thumb is that you need X times as much light for confocal as you do for SPIM where X is the number of slices in your stack. | * A rule of thumb is that you need X times as much light for confocal as you do for SPIM where X is the number of slices in your stack. | ||
* [[http:// | * [[http:// | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Using Bessel beams to create the sheet can improve Z-resolution for single-view SPIM, but won't meaningfully change dual view resolution after registration/ | * Using Bessel beams to create the sheet can improve Z-resolution for single-view SPIM, but won't meaningfully change dual view resolution after registration/ | ||
* **XY resolution: | * **XY resolution: | ||
- | * **Speed:** SPIM (per view) and SDCM have comparable speed (assuming | + | * **Speed:** SPIM (per view) and SDCM have comparable speed if SDCM laser intensity |
- | * Camera readout bounds the maximum achievable frame rate. For example, 512 pixels high ROI is 2.5 ms readout time for sCMOS. | + | * Camera readout |