This is an old revision of the document!

Comparison of diSPIM With Confocal

The following comparison was written with diSPIM in mind, but the main points apply to all types of SPIM/LSFM.

Spinning disk confocal (SDCM) is just a massively parallel confocal implementation so it's faster but otherwise has the some characteristics as laser scanning confocal.

  • Light dose: Confocal has much more photobleaching/phototoxicity than SPIM (i.e. SPIM uses the excitation light much more efficiently). Low light dose is the main motivation for most SPIM users.
    • A rule of thumb is that you need X times as much light for confocal as you do for SPIM where X is the number of slices in your stack.
    • Figure 3 and Supplementary Video 2 of Wu et al. offer bleaching comparisons of imaging with diSPIM and SDCM. Other papers such as this one offer comparisons of light sheet with confocal which should apply to diSPIM.
  • Z resolution: diSPIM after registration/fusion has best Z-resolution. Next best is confocal, which in turn has better Z resolution than single-view SPIM.
    • Using Bessel beams to create the sheet can improve Z-resolution for single-view SPIM, but won't meaningfully change dual view resolution after registration/fusion.
  • XY resolution: confocal and SPIM are comparable.
  • Speed: SPIM (per view) and SDCM have comparable speed (assuming SDCM has higher laser intensity to make up for the ~3% open area of the spinning disks).
    • Camera readout speed bounds the maximum achievable frame rate. For example, 512 pixels high ROI is 2.5 ms readout time for sCMOS. Allowing 2.5 ms illumination time results in 5 ms total per image or 200 frames per second.